Arizona Cardinals among favorites to sign Dez Bryant according to one Vegas book

The Arizona Cardinals have played in three preseason games and they have no idea what they have in their receiving corps outside of Larry Fitzgerald.Their leading receiver in terms of catches is Christian Kirk D.J. Humphries Jersey , with eight for 59 yards.Their leading receiver in terms of yards is Jalen Tolliver with 74, 48 of which came on one catch in the first game against the LA Chargers.That is why the when MyBookie weighed in on who the front-runner is to sign Dez Bryant, the Cardinals came back as a team with some of the best odds to sign the free agent receiver.From MyBookie:Cleveland Browns 3/1 (+300)New England Patriots 4/1 (+400)Jacksonville Jaguars 4/1 (+400)Seattle Seahawks 5/1 (+500)Arizona Cardinals 6/1 (+600)New York Giants 10/1 (+1000)Tennessee Titans 10/1 (+1000)Does not play 3/1 (+300)Field (Any Other Team) 5/1 (+500)When you look it from a position/fit standpoint, it makes sense that the Cardinals would be tied with Bryant.They have Fitz and not much else in terms of known commodities.Bryant is not the same player he once was, but he is still a name and a player who can put up numbers.Now, the other side of the equation is Authentic David Johnson Jersey , why would the Cardinals want Bryant?Dallas is in a worse position from a receiver standpoint and didn’t bring Bryant back.Cleveland allegedly offered Bryant a deal worth less than $5 million, would the Cardinals really want to beat that in terms of price?Is a short term deal in Arizona worth more than Cleveland for Bryant?While the odds are there, it seems far fetched that Bryant, barring an injury, will end up in the desert.Josh Rosen’s first NFL work was rough according to Pro Football Focus After the dust settled at University of Phoenix Stadium in the Arizona Cardinals 24-17 win over the Los Angeles Chargers, the question on everyone’s mind was... Can we get Josh Rosen some help Youth Budda Baker Jersey , please?The Cardinals offensive line was bad, the wide receivers lacked any sort of play making ability and the entire offense looked like a bad team full of rookies.That’s why when the grades on the game came out from Pro Football Focus, it was a little surprising to see Rosen’s so low.The idea behind grading is that each player’s grade is independent of those around him and that the grade occurs in a vacuum.That’s also been one of the biggest criticism of the PFF model from fans and players alike, is that how can you grade something when you don’t know the assignment.However, Rosen’s work on Saturday was not good, let’s not sugarcoat that at all http://www.cardinalsauthorizedshops.com/authentic-christian-kirk-jersey , but much if not all the blame could fall on those around him.So, when PFF released their grades for all five first round rookies, it was a bit surprising to see Rosen at the bottom, by a big margin:https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pr...son-week-1Rosen’s score is indicative of his play, but even PFF acknowledges that much of that was because he was playing from behind at the start of each snap:The other odd comment from the article was the question of would Rosen or Bradford see much clean work, where Rosen was above the NFL average Josh Rosen Jersey , this season:Again, it seems like the issue was more the backup offensive lines inability to do any type of quality blocking, and should have no meaning for the work of Bradford or Rosen when it comes to the regular season.This was an odd article, even if the grading made sense from an on the field stand point.